Giants needed Beltran?

Did the SF Giants need Carlos Beltran to repeat in the National League [and the WS]? You bet your butt they did! Just look at the Powerful hitting [and pitching] lineups they are likely to face. Philadelphia with it's triple threat pitching rotation and it's powerful hitting lineup. Forget about those potent American League offenses [ie: Red Sox, Yankees, Texas, etc]

The Giant's offense is generally considered the 3rd worst offense in Baseball. They are lucky to be over .500 [let alone 16 games over .500!]. Their pitching is solid, but their hitting has been suspect. They have just been lucky, so far, to be where they are. They have the prospects, they have the salary capp space. So, why not make a splash in the Pre-Deadline trade-market?

Angels Starter throws a No-No over Indians

Angels Starter, Ervin Santana, threw the first nine inning no-hitter for the Angels in nearly 27 years to lead the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim to victory over the Cleveland Indians by a score of 3-1 this past Wednesday.

And there was much rejoycing! Looks like a bunch of kids winning a Little League Game. That's what makes MLB so fun to watch!

Instant Replay WILL be added to MLB!

Anyone who saw [or heard about] the 19 inning debacle between the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Atlanta Braves, which ended with an obviously BAD call at the plate {Julio Lugo was out by a few feet!}, knows there will HAVE to be some additional usage or framework for some form of Instant Replay in Major League Baseball. I know that Baseball 'purists' say that the Human Element is part of the game, but when millions of viewers watching a game live, and [potentially] Billions of viewers can watch things immediately afterwards [in slow motion - frame by frame] online on the Internet have a better view and knowledge than the Umpires in a Game, we are going to have uprisings. There simply MUST be a way that Instant Replay can be added to MLB games without causing things to slow down to a crawl. I mean, look at the NHL. They have Instant Replay available [from the home Office!] for every [potential] goal to make sure that IF the puck even brushes across the line for a split second, that goal is recorded.

Stay Tuned!

Double-Digit Mastry?

How often does a Major League team put up 10 runs in one game? 5 times per season? 8 times per season? Not sure what the average is over-all in the past, but the Boston Red Sox seem to be doing it at least weekly, if not twice a week!

Let's look at the math. There were 4 weeks in April. There were 4.5 weeks in May. There were 4+ weeks in June. There are 4 weeks in July. That is 17 weeks [give or take a day] and we are NOT yet done with July. The Boston Red Sox have placed at least 10 runs on the board in 16 games [so far] in the season. What is even more amazing about this is that they did not do this [at all] in April. They only did it 3 times in May. In June, they did it 6 times and [so far] in July they have accomplished this feat an incredible 7 times! That's 7 times in an incomplete month which was also abbreviated by the All-Star-Break! Not only are they putting up more than 10 runs, many times they are putting up a couple of Touch-downs on the board. By touch-downs I mean that the Sox put up at least 14 runs! Out of those 16 games with more than 10 runs, 7 of them had 14 or more runs. I'm not sure statistics like this are tracked with much regularity or accuracy, but this team has an incredible amount of offense!

July 30th 2011 - update: Red Sox scored 10 runs [again] tonight {in their 10-2 victory} making this the 17th game where they put up 10 runs [at least] of the 2011 Season. That's 17 weeks and 17 games with 10 runs or more. It's getting to be like clockwork! 1 per week [minimum] and many times twice per week.

Recently, Tim Wakefield has given up large numbers of runs [early] in games, but has still won those games because the offense put up 11 runs per game! Now THAT is run support!

August 6th 2011 - update: Red Sox scored 10 runs [again] today. This time against their 'hated rivals' The Yankees. 18 weeks and 18 games with 10 runs or more. Clockwork - still!

August 23rd 2011 - update: Red Sox scored over 10 runs again, tonight, at Texas. There has been a 'power-outage' among the Sox valued offense. This is the first 10+ run game since August 6th [nearly two and a half weeks!]. So now we are at this rate: 19 games with 10+ runs scored by the Sox in 20.5 weeks. Still pretty impressive!

August 25th 2011 - update: The Boston Red Sox continued their heavy-hitting-ways last night. They put up a touchdown and two field goals in their 13-2 rout of the Texas Rangers. For those of you that are counting [like me] they have now hit 10+ runs in 20 games in 20.5 weeks. I would not be surprised to see another game like this, this very week - to keep up their torrid pace. - Incredible!

September 7th - update: The Red Sox have scored more than 10 runs in two more games. This continues their torrid pace for the season. On Sept 3rd they scored 12 against the Texas Rangers [again] and then scored 14 against Toronto last night [Sept 6th]. They even scored 9 against the NY Yankees on August 31st, but have also lost their lead of the Division to the Yankees because they lost several games over the last week and a half. So, now, we are at 22. 5 weeks and the Sox have scored 10 or more runs in 22 games. Still inccredible [but what would all that mean if they do not win the Division?!?]. - Stay Tuned!

Sept 12th Update: Red Sox added another 10 plus run game [although it was a defeat!]. They lost 11-10 to the Toronto Blue Jays. At present, they have lost about 8 of their last 11 games. This is causing concern in Red Sox Nation, even if they do score 10+ runs every week. The play-offs are approaching and the Sox are beginning to play very poorly. I hope it is just a short phase!

Sept 14th Update: Red Sox put up another 2+ Touchdown performance, last night. They scored 18 runs [7 of them in 1 inning!] beating the Toronto Blue Jays 18 - 6. While this feat means that they have put up 10+ runs in 24 games [within 24 weeks] - it does not guarantee that they make the play-offs. Tampa Bay happened to lose last night [to the Orioles - no less!] but they are just 4 games back of the Sox in the Wild Card hunt and I think the Sox are just too far back [4 games] from the Yankees to over-take them in the Division [AL East].

Sept 20th Update: Red Sox put up another 2+ Touchdown performance, last night. Again, they scored 18 runs [7 in one inning!] beating the lowly Baltimore Orioles 18 - 9. Now, if they had not lost the early game of the double-header, I might feel a bit better! They are holding onto their lead in the Wildcard race by a thread. They are 2 games ahead of Tampa Bay [a team with better pitching] and way too far behind the Yankees to even think of winning the Division. They have lost 15 of their last 20 games! What does it matter that they have scored 10+ runs in 25 games in the last 25 weeks? It means nothing!

Seattle needs to rebuild

The Seattle Mariners have lost their franchise record 15th game in a row, today. They are in sorry shape. Pitching seems to be inconsistent and hitting seems to be nearly non-existent! Do they really care in the upper west coast region that follows these Mariners? Hard to say. But something needs to happen there in the next year or two to mkake them competitive again.

Note from July 28th: NEWS FLASH! - Seattle Mariners have won a game! Losing streak ends at 17. They beat the NY Yankees [to boot!]. Way to go!

Tim Wakefield and Cy Young in the same sentence?

Who would EVER place Tim Wakefield in the same sentence as Cy Young [or Roger Clemens for that matter]? But it is happening. Wakefield has nearly 200 wins in the big leagues. He has 185 of them with the Red Sox. Roger and Cy are tied atop the Red Sox wins category with 192 wins each. Wakefield only needs 8 more to pass them. Could happen this year? [Not likely] but could REALLY happen in April or May of 2012. Stay tuned.

Today, Tim Wakefield celebrated his 199th win in the Major Leagues. 199 wins for a knuckleballer! Seems kinda odd. The largest reason is longevity. Pitching knuckleballs is much less strenuous on the throwing arm. Allows for better healing between starts and more years able to continue pitching. You see, Wakefield is 44 years old. There does not seem to be any reason for him to hang-up his spikes yet either! He just keeps slinging his knuckleballs and frustrating most hitters [and a few Catchers] and keeps grinding out numbers. 199 wins [check] 2000 strike-outs [check] Age 44 [check] Starting pitcher [check] Long relief man [check] short relief man [check] relief appearence between starts [check] - the man is a machine. He just keeps on going and going..

Go Wake!

Update 08/23/2011 - There have been at least 4 chances for Tim Wakefield to have reached the 200 Wins mark, but he just has not made it. He has pitched pretty well, but many of these games had low scoring offense from the Sox hitters. A couple of these games had Tim leave when they were ahead, but the game bec ame tied [or something] and a few times the Sox even came back and won the game, but the 'W' went to another pitcher. Still waiting! Hopefully this week!

ALL Star [?] Game

With all of the recent rash of players deciding NOT to play in this year's All Star Game, it's a wonder that this game keeps it's name "All Star Game". Yesterday, eight more players threw in the towel. Even John Lester from the Red Sox was placed on the Roster to fill the spot of an injured player, and then was replaced, himself, due to the fact that he is on the 15 day DL. Weird!

No Yankee has 3000 hits? Are you kidding?

This season there are several things to watch and monitor in MLB. Schedules and opponents are one aspect. Division Titles and Standings are another. Then there are the various pursuit of the Season's awards [such as Cy Young Award, MVP, etc]. But, this year, there is also a career pursuit to watch. Derek Jeter will surpass the 3000 hit mark [this weekend?] this year. 3000 Hits does not seem like it is THAT rare. There are alot of people who have surpassed this number. Then again, there are alot of Hall of Famers who have NOT surpassed this number.

Also, can you believe that no Yankee has surpassed this number? None. Not one little Yankee. Not one. None! Former consecutive games king, Lou Gehrig did NOT make 3000 hits. Neither did "The Mick" nor "The Babe". Even  "Mr. Coffee" Joe D [Dimaggio] did NOT hit 3000. Even [recent?] hit machines like Bernie Williams or Don Matingly never reached the 3000 hit level. The Yankees only have 8 players [including Derek Jeter] who have surpassed the 2000 hit level!

Seems very hard to believe. With all the Hall of Fame Members to have come out of that team over the past 10 - 11 decades, you'd think there would be a few [let alone one].

Update from July 9th 2011: Derek Jeter hit his 3,000th hit today!

Must be very hard to get to 3000 hits. It takes longevity [years and games], hit production, health [staying off the DL], and Defensive superiority [otherwise you might not remain a starter!]. Must be very hard indeed. It could not happen to a better player, either. Derek Jeter is about as nice of a player as you get. He plays hard. He hits hard. He gets his small hits. He runs hard. He gets injured, but does not linger on the DL. He is a professional. He is an athlete. He is a superior player who deserves all of the accolades he has coming to him over the next week and this season.

All this from a life-long Boston Red Sox fan [who HATES the Yankees] - Pretty Strong Words.